Earlier in the semester, the class was asked to read a few articles on this show that showed how it can influence youth when choosing a career path. I saw an episode on T.V. and decided to further analyze its misrepresentations in society.
The class saw plenty of proof that women see the two opposites of the spectrum when looking up to the female role models on the show. You see women that are extremely book-smart, yet very socially challenged and exhibit many stereotypical “nerdy” characteristics. Then you see a woman who’s attractive and blond, with only an average intelligence. This paints a very negative picture, in young girls in particular, about females that choose to enter into a career relating to science or engineering. It implies that you can only choose between two types of people. I found that the show doesn’t just stop at female stereotypes in STEM fields either.
I read a lengthy article online that analyzes the negative portrayals of engineers within the general media. A portion of this article focuses on this show and how it portrays engineers in a certain negative light. Specifically analyzed is the aerospace engineer within the show, Howard Wolowitz. Just to give you a taste, I’ll lay out some of the following characteristics of this main character.
- Socially awkward
- Lives with his mother (even after he gets engaged)
- Dresses in vintage 1960’s clothing
- Loves comics and superheroes
- Embarrasses himself repeatedly when trying to pick up girls
- Has a collection of around a hundred belt buckles (one of them is a Nintendo controller)
Clearly, the show paints a picture of what the stereotypical engineer is supposed to look like in society. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with a person like this, but the simple fact is that a majority of engineers are not at all like the one portrayed here in the show. Over the course of the show, this character and the engineering field in general, seems to be mocked by the show’s writers. For example, Howard works with NASA and one episode shows how poorly the profession as a whole is depicted. He’s shown working on a design project for NASA and of the hundreds of cool and exciting designs he could have been working on, the writers chose to have him develop a space toilet. The writers further mocked his ability by showing that the design was flawed, and would explode after ten flushes.
Overall, the show depicts a number of engineering and scientific stereotypes that definitely would not inspire a young viewer to want to be like these characters.
-Danny
Fabian, Andrew. "Engineers in Popular Media." Digital Commons. Olin College, 1 Apr. 2012. Web. <http://digitalcommons.olin.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=ahs_capstone_2012>.

The Big Bank Theory is definitely one of the most popular shows on television. Do you think this is because of the stereotypes depicted or do you think the show would be as equally popular with the stereotypes removed?
ReplyDeleteI think stereotypes definitely have to do with the humor of the show. So realistically, it probably would not be as popular. Some exaggerated aspects of the show could probably be removed while still maintaining the humor of the show. But, I do think the show is pretty funny as it is, however, I can see how some of the stereotypes could impact certain viewers.
DeleteI honestly do not enjoy the show myself. But I do believe that there is a few that are true in the show. Do you believe that there is something that defines a typical engineer? Or the typical engineer could just be anybody?
ReplyDeleteI don't think it's too likely to become an engineer if you're not interested in math and science. Other than that, I would say any personality type could become an engineer if they worked hard enough. I don't think you need to be a geek or anything, there are plenty of outgoing and confident engineers that act nothing like the main characters in the show.
Delete